I haven’t done a drug Sunday in a while, but I feel as though I should, given the heinousness of my previous post. You see, I have some sort of anxiety disorder or something which appears to run in my family. I usually work this out with running but haven’t been able to do that for a while and, consequently, the anxiety gets the better of me. NOW, a consequence of said anxiety is insomnia – which is essentially the most annoying side effect. (Most of my family are insomniacs. At any given point, I could wake up and find some member of my family awake in the house, watching TV or playing on the internets or, in the case of the grandparents, smoking cigarettes reading newspapers…)
Whatever. The short of the long of it is sometimes I can’t sleep and so I turn to chemistry to help me. Ambien, consequently, plays an infrequent roll in my life. As I have said before, I’m totally sXe (hahah) and have little experience with recreational drugs. However, since I received my first prescription for Ambien in college, I have collected a few unusual stories:
- I woke up with bruises on my knees and several forts constructed out of couch cushions in my living room.
- I woke up face down in a pint of melted and congealed ice cream in my living room wearing nothing but a cashmere frock coat.
- I woke up to discover that the walls of my room had been covered in aluminum foil.
That’s just to name a few… needless to say, I usually take the drug only when I have little other discourse and there is someone else at home. My wife, Mrs. Finchsigmate, is usually my trip sitter – though she’s generally asleep by the time I realize it’s either going to be an Ambien night or no sleeping at all.
ANYWAY, not that’s out of the way, let’s discuss Zolpidem, the chemical also known as Ambien.
Synthesis of Zolpidem can be accomplished in a fairly steppy but simple synthesis starting with the commercially available Methylacetophenone:
The mechanism of action of Zolpidem works by potentiating γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) by binding to benzodiazepine receptors, though the drug bares no structural resemblance to benzodiazepines (well… not very much). The patent on the drug was held by Sanofi-Aventis and is now available in generic form. A new formulation called Ambien CR supposedly extends the very short 2 hour half life, allowing patients to “sleep through the night” by retarding the rate of drug release from the capsule in the digestive system.
Ambien sales before generic were 2.1 billion per annum, the Ambien CR formlulation as of 2008 rakes in almost 900 million per annum – so Sanofi isn’t starving having lost their cash cow.
But, by far, the most notorious thing about Zolpidem is the associated sleep walking and amnesia. My anecdotes above are drops int he pond of larger reports that the drug has been associated with unusual behaviors that place the victim in precarious and even deadly situations. Why this drug is even allowed on the market at all is beyond me but it’s certainly effective.
Zolpidem is a drug of abuse and trip reports have been extensively loged at Erowid. From my own personal experience, hallucinations are rare but can be fantastic (in the sense that they give the illusion of rather incredible things occurring – such as seeing the television you’re watching, while waiting for the drug to kick in, fly into the air and bounce off the ceiling like a balloon.)



I need to get me some ambien…all of my friends that are unable to sleep say that ambien does little to curb their insomnia. On the other hand, it is a pretty big seller so it must work for the majority of individuals. Hope you don’t see that creepy bunny from Donnie Darko.
i was prescribed ambien a couple days ago, it sure puts me to sleep, but only for 4 hours, then i wake up, take another and go back to sleep, and i’m still tired/groggy in the morning. Definitely not what i signed up for.
I hear that you can experience a far more powerful trip when you combine Ambien CR with a small spoon of Epsom salt or Mg citrate, and wash it down with a pint of Gatorade. (It has to be the orange Gatorade otherwise it may not work properly). It is completely legal thing to do, and a pretty memorable way to prevent boredom on a long flight.
In all seriousness, try smoking a little marijuana. Self medicate!
Was it Renolds Wrap or a cheap store brand? You’re lucky you didn’t end up in an ER saying “I sat on it by accident.”
HA! Nice!
Try obsessive list-making? I have an anxiety thing too, and it’s the only way I can sleep sometimes. As long as everything is out of my head and on paper, I can safely forget about it.
I think you should count it a blessing that you haven’t been involved in sleep-driving. That’s just scary to think about.
I took Ambien one time, and when I woke up I had a PhD in chemistry. Try explaining that to your loved ones!
You’ll become increasingly irrational on that stuff.
There exist quite a few articles on how it was likely that prozac/ambien taking traders drove a number of hedge funds over the edge. Only a jacked up drugged out day-trader would leverage himself at 40:1 and bet against crude in 2007.
You see that stuff negates negative feelings, thus undermining common sense and your decision making ability. We need to feel pain so we know which direction to go. You can’t under-cut your ‘gut feelings’. I say always go with your gut.
Right now your gut is asleep, hence you’re making irrational/high risk decisions which feed your ego (as in believing you have a chance to teach at an R1 school. You have no pedigree, and have not suffered enough).
Since you’re married, you’re obviously not lonely. My guess is that you’re in denial about how few options you have as a chemist. The problem is that if you make any life changing decisions on Ambien (there are many at your time of life), that stuff will push you places you probably don’t want to go)
I say bite the bullet and get an MBA or Law degree.
http://www.abusegroup.com/ambi.....-abuse.php
p.s -Tom Cruise believes all that I wrote above!
Ambien and chlorodiazepoxide are actually pretty similar according to their Tanimoto shape similarity coefficient.
Has anyone here tried Salvia? I am interested since it seems to be legal in many states (for now)
long story short, smoke a high powered extract. most of what ive heard smoking straight leaves takes forever and is generally a lame time.
if you do smoke an extract, you will most likely achieve intense “results” typically lasting 5-10 minutes, with perhaps a slight “afterglow” for another 20. it seems that most people tend to not like the effects, but to each their own.
forecast: you’ll try it between 1-5 times and either realize you don’t like the effects, or that the overall experience is neutral at best. (intriguing experience for sure, but the expense, effort, short trip time don’t compare to other hallucinogens)
to make a long story even shorter, just go check erowid, fool.
try this http://cbtforinsomnia.com/
It’s a online course for insomnia
Dude, try meditation or something. Ambien seems to be a liability for you. Or a liability waiting to happen. And don’t listen to your internet friends, they appear to be off their faces…Or want to be.
Did you read the post “Reporting Analytical Data” by editor C. Dale Poulter in J. Org. that seven manuscripts that were rejected on essentially suspicions of made-up data last year were resubmitted without change to other journals, apparently all from academic institutions, setting a “horrible example for their young colleagues”. Since the eds know who committed this fraud, why don’t they publish the names of the groups so we will know whose groups publish papers that are “LaClairs”.
He is not saying that most of the re-published stuff was fraudulent – only that it was not up to the JOC high standards.
Many of the manuscripts were “frozen” by JOC editors until the authors provide additional spectral data – and most often the missing required data was hi-res mass spec and/or elementary analysis.
Since I don’t have an easy access to hi-res MS or elementary analysis myself, and would have to pay and send out samples of every damned thing (in case that we later decide to publish it in JOC) I can empathize with authors who decide to re-submit their work into a less hard-assed journal instead. I mean, if you have a clean NMR spectra and decent low-res MS, this should be good enough.
Elemental analysis is a joke. The guy over in my institution just does multiple runs until he gets what he was looking for and the weighing method isn’t that accurate. The bad runs just get thrown out. I’m sure a lot of the companies that everyone sends their samples to fudge the numbers by a percentage point since the technique is not as accurate as the editors of ACS journals and PIs would like to believe. I stopped believing my company after they lost my samples for three months, then found them after I told them how hard it is to make the samples again and reported all the amounts within 0.4% but divided by 10. I sent a sample that I purified (but not rigorously) to another company to check trustworthiness but got another positive result. Accurate to within 0.4%…. give me a break. More like within 2%.
I wonder how many editors, with their own little hands, have actually ever done an elemental analysis? Once we have an answer to this question, this farcical ‘rigorous’ requirement will be dropped from most journals in favor of low res MS and NMR FID files (which, I realize, cannot tell you if inorganic salts are present in your sample. But for most organic samples, COME ON… seriously?)
Oh yeah and another thing. Elemental analysis is supposed to test the purity of a compound. Most of the time you use that compound for further experiments. Do you do the rigorous purification* that you did for the elemental analysis each time? Hell no! That means you’re not using pure compound in subsequent experiments and your results are suspect and you didn’t tell the JCAS editor you’re not using the elemental analysis purified sample so now it’s fraud. OH MY GOD, YOU ARE A BAD LYING CHEMIST!!!!
* Well, it’s not an issue for me since I stopped rigorously purifying things for Elemental Analysis a long time ago due to knowing it’s a scam, but there are still a lot of suckers out there wasting their weekends and precious grant money on shipping and inflated charges.
Okay. End of rant. I’m breathing normally now. Grr…. elemental analysis. Note to self: “Must remember to be a normal person”.
If it’s not fraudulent, then what does he mean by “inconsistent data”?
it means data that is not consistent with making the editor happy