I was recently interviewed by Nature on the state of blogs and anonymity and whatnot and the interviewer had an interesting question: Why is the population of chemistry blogs so high relative to other disciplines? There have been a number of posts on why chemistry is so absent in popular media – (IMHO, it lacks the “God element” present in biology/medicine and physics, especially astrophysics, which makes it less interesting to the masses. The complexities and fuzzy logic employed by astrophysicists requires nothing less than a religiosity to believe some of the odd shit they sling out.)
Anyway, it’s disheartening that there are very few blogs about physics and biology compared to chemistry since the future is integrated approaches. If I could, I would seek out a lively biologist to team up with on the Chem Blog, but I know of none. It would be awesome to have a readable blog about either field, since I consider both of them too far off topic to be approachable.
Anyway, my response to the Nature interviewer (the interview should be available via pod cast next month) was that the chemistry blog-o-sphere had a number of very strong voices and drew a lot of inspiration to a lot of people. Particularly catalytic in that was Dylan Stiles, Paul Bracher and Paul Docherty. When asked if I was a strong voice, I arrogantly replied affirmatively, but that’s just my style and I was the subject of the interview in any case, so I had to have some degree of impact. I know that I have made no secret that I started blogging because of Dylan’s post on Otera’s Catalyst, which he employed in his recent Org. Let. publication. (I did not find it via Bengu Sezen, though I did exploit her to jump start my blog via trackbacks to Dylan’s, which is a wee shameful, but it worked. Besides, if Blogging really had any superstar it was her. It is, after all, the news that makes the reporter, not the other way around [though, with blogging, that argument can be contested].)
The walls are too high really to make a plea to people in other fields to start blogs, since I don’t think physicists or biologists frequent this blog, but if they WERE here, I would ask them to consider it.
UPDATE: Well, here is the podcast. I sound like a rambling douche, which is why I’m putting it all the way down here where no one will see it. It’s after the nanotube blahblah (the language is Hebrew, by the way.)
For those interested: A laptop is a necessity today. Usually dell laptops are the ones preferred by almost everyone. The biggest contributory factor remains the reliability of the laptop batteries.



I was interviewed too for the podcast. I look forward to hearing your sexy voice. Like most everyone else, I heard about Tenderbutton (and chem blogging) through the controversies. Actually, my first TB experience was the La Clair/hexacyclinol brouhaha. It was discussing this with a friend that I found out that she posted an anonymous materials blog with the pseudonym Ψ*Ψ… and the rest, as they say, is pretty boring.
I would like to see more interesting biology/physics blogs out there, but I think part of it is chemists (particularly organic chemists) are a particularly irreverent, gossipy, bitchy bunch. Makes for better blogging. I do like this guy’s blog, though. It’s biochemmy.
I have a pinched voice, i think. Its horrible. Besides the phone connection was pretty bad.
Hey, at least they got you. My phone connection was so bad it was impossible to use.
Also, Excimer, I really really like Brandon’s blog too (and everyone should read it).
Chemistry requires vast knowledge before one can be stupid in public. Anybody can spew “Einstein was wrong!” Physicists don’t have crystals, kewl Pyrex, or stereograms,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/benzil.png
Ya gotta love it!
An ACS meeting second day opens with hangovers and more than a few folks laid. An APS meeting is twitching autists. Chemistry is joy in the universe. Physics keeps the books.
BTW, Einstein could be proven wrong within existing theory and without contradiction of any prior observation in any venue at any scale. All it requires is… wait for it… CHEMISTRY!
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.pdf
Physics and math bushwa; 90 days and ~$(US)350K.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
3mm benzil crystals and two DSCs, 2 days and $5K
Bench time is life; everything else is waiting.
You actually inspired me to start a blog. I frequent some chemistry blogs and I was baffled to see that there were no biology blogs. So, I started a cell biology one (http://thecellblog.blogspot.com/).
What are you talking about? – There are many more top-quality high-energy physics and theoretical physisc blogs and quantum computing and math blogs then good chemistry blogs. Among chemistry blogs only Org Prep Daily comes close.
There are several good blogs in those disciplines if one just looks.
Mitch
I’ll reply to you since Milkshake is a very silly man. There are several good blogs in those disciplines, indeed, but few in number. That’s the point. It seems as though blogs in those disciplines are more disproportionately run by faculty and political as opposed to blogs like this or CBC, which both have a number of posts which do a rundown of work in the fields.
If you know of blogs which are grad student run good blogs, by all means, please – lemme have the URLs.
What is Kyle missing out(In’t gonna answer him for he is a complete Philistine and is not making good on his repeated promise – even though I reminded him that he needs to hurry up)
http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/ (Shtetl Optimized is an invaluable source of discussion on quantum computing and biting vaginas, both very thrilling but rather hypothetical problems)
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/ (John Baez This Weeks Finds is very interesting even though I don’t pretend to understand the math)
http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/ (The n-category cafe. Very lively and completely incemprehensible)
http://dabacon.org/pontiff/ (Quantum Pontiff – another funny quant complexity theorist)
http://cosmicvariance.com/ (cosmic variance – High energy physics mostly)
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/ (Not Even Wrong – Anti string and HEP gossip)
http://scienceblogs.com/principles/ (Uncertain Principles – life and thoughts of an experimental laser physisc prof)
http://tsm2.blogspot.com/ (Statistical Mechanic – From a physicist turned to a finance analyst)
+about 20 more blogs, for example as listed in Not Even Wrong
You can tell milkshake to tell me what promise he is talking about, since we aren’t talking.
the comment section of http://www.thechemblog.com/?p=497#comments
I take it back. I have something to live for: watching milkshake suffer in the blog-o-sphere.
I’m a biologist, and I blog.
I’m not sure your initial assertion, that there is a preponderance of chemistry blogs, is correct. Postgenomic tries to keep up with the science blogosphere, and currently lists 139 blogs in the “life sciences” category, 42 blogs in “chemistry” and 122 in “physics”.
Your blogroll is nearly 60 blogs which, even accounting for a few biologists and generalists in there, indicates that Postgenomic is missing a few — but still. (Euan is always grateful for suggested additions to his blog list, btw).
Most of the 40 or so science blogs in my blogroll are biologists. Several of these are strongly cross-disciplinary: Biocurious, Cosma’s Notebooks/Three-Toed Sloth, Useful Chemistry.
I wonder what the breakdown is for the science specialists among the ~1500 blogs in Bora’s blogroll?
My point is not that we need an interdisciplinary pissing contest, but that the science blogosphere is growing and diversifying very rapidly, and it’s difficult to keep tabs on it. I think Postgenomic offers an excellent way to do this — all we need do is keep suggesting blogs! (Although eventually, Postgenomic will need some kind of distributed/automated submission system — a toolbar button that anyone can install to suggest a blog, and a way to screen out multiple submissions/redundancy before human eyeballs have to make the choice “is this a science blog? should it be indexed by Postgenomic?”.)
As your post illlustrates, this data — who are the science bloggers, what are they talking about, how do their interests intersect — represents a powerful tool for establishing interesting and useful collaborations and conversations. I think you are exactly right when you say “the future is integrated approaches”.
BTW, I had the same question as PMR (pingback above) — is the diagram the blogosphere, the chemoblogosphere, or what?
“Anyway, it’s disheartening that there are very few blogs about physics and biology compared to chemistry since the future is integrated approaches”
Let’s not get ahead of ourselves here. What happens when you push for “integrated approaches” is dilettantery and half-assed science. Crossovers (like NMR, Crystallography, biochemistry, laser flash photolysis) happen when someone sits down, puts a nice pair of blinders over their eyes and takes a good long time to figure out what they are doing without a care for how sexily interdisciplinary their work is, often times without a hoot about what the applications (or ramifications) are.
In my field, we have a lot of chemists rushing to understand “why X Y or Z is biologically relevant” who have abandoned meticulous, mechanistic investigations (because those are actually quite hard to do). And a lot of biologists who think they can do mechanistic investigations without knowing a damn thing about the assays they are doing.
maybe I’m overly old-fashioned.
Check your spamfolder? I left a comment but it had a few links in it…
There is a growing enclave among the DNA/genetics fraternity too, which I mentioned on Sciencebase recently.
http://www.sciencebase.com/sci.....twork.html
db
Loved the podcast. I wish they would provide a supporting-information podcast where we could listen to the un-cut phone interviews in their entirety.
I was surprisingly civil for the entire interview, and I didn’t swear once. So for mine you’d just get a lot more of me saying “um” and “uh” and that’s about it. I’m sure Kyle’s was more interesting.
Nah. I would have just sounded more douchetastic. I fail at humility and discretion in every way.
humility and discretion? you’re a BLOGGER. leave those at the door, the show is about to begin…
I enjoyed the podcast. Thank you.