32 Dendrimers are the new black. They’ll come with your next iPod and you’ll see Madonna flying into Chemistry labs to illegally adopt them. But they suffer from a rather attractive flaw: they’re a bitch to make.
Any reaction where you can plan a whole vacation around is GREAT. The traditional synthesis (or at least the best and highest yielding procedure I could find) for PAMAM dendrimers involves a wonderfully uncomplicated 7 day room temperature stir after you just did a 3 day reaction. Seriously, you can make all your vacations working vacations with this sort of chemistry. Karl Sharples’s came along and introduced “click” chemistry and then everyone made dendrimers filled with triazoles. Which is fine, I guess, if you want greasy heteroaromats in your dendrons (which do not, consequently aid in water solubility – sadly.)
Craig J. Hawker (DOI: 10.1021/ja8006325 And how about that title? Now there’s a man that knows the value of his work.) has come to change that. He successfully used the word “click” correctly to produce a new method to make dendrimers in one of those brilliant advancements. He took chemistry that was well known and applied it to a big problem to produce an elegant solution. Bravo, I’d say.
The Thiol-ene reaction, which doesn’t even have its own Wiki entry, is a remarkably clean and simple reaction for a radical mediated process. Using a photoinitiator, with a bit of UV radiation, you can promote the radical coupling of thiols with alkenes.
The article then goes on to detail the experiments done to prove that the reaction is nigh quantitative, requires only 1.5 equivalents of starting material and requires no chromatography. The dendrimer is continued by addition of 4-pentenoic anhydride (quantitativly) to produce another round of alkenes for reaction with thioglycerol.
The final product, take out to 4 generations (read the wiki article if you’re unfamiliar with the concept of “generations in dendrimer synthesis) was then “coated” or functionalized with different compounds, including compounds with benzylic protons and acidic protons and any other number of easily extracted protons…
Solid work, IMHO. I think this can be put to serious use in a very short period of time.
Which is more awesome/impressive
- Writing a review article (57%, 112 Votes)
- Writing a book chapter (43%, 85 Votes)
Total Voters: 197
Loading ...
Killops, K.L., Campos, L.M., Hawker, C.J. (2008). Robust, Efficient, and Orthogonal Synthesis of Dendrimers via Thiol-ene “Click†Chemistry. Journal of the American Chemical Society DOI: 10.1021/ja8006325
Back to top
Triazoles are very polar, actually. Too polar- try to make dendrimers with them and you get brick dust that’s not even soluble in water. We tried that once. It didn’t work. Triazoles suck.
Hawker co-invented what are now termed Frechet dendrimers (poly(benzyl ether) dendrimers) which are a pain in the ass to make (like all the others), so I’m glad he finally got around to making ones that are easier to make. So, who needs 48 pyrenes on a molecule, anyway? Anyone?
Actually, I take that back. Divergent dendrimer synthesis sucks. Convergent synthesis is wayyy easier, but you’re limited to how big you can make them (that’s what she said).
I have found that the solubility in chloroform goes up a bit and then goes back down as more triazoles are added, though I have only had the “pleasure” of working with small molecules with around 4 of them. I’ve never tried to make a dendrimer with triazole linkers. We initially believed (at least I did) that addition of triazoles would “aid” in water solubility – i.e. of all coupling methods the one that introduced the most polar group should be best, right? Wrong. Triazoles fucking suck and the sooner people wrap their little goddamn brain around that the better.
I don’t know why they would turn your shit into brick dust, however. I can’t say I’ve ever seen that, even with 40+ triazoles in a molecule. Granted, flat things tend to do that – but polar things do that because of wicked hydrogen bonding capabilities, of which triazoles cannot donate. Making them bottoms in the polar world – only receiving.
people making kinase inhibitors suffered long and hard with compounds that have too many heterocycles with too many hydrogen bond acceptors and donors in the molecule. Several amide NHs and triazoles in one molecule is a sure road to brickdom.
That was a while ago, so I don’t remember how many triazoles it took to turn it into brick dust (though I want to say 8- we tried making frechet-type dendrimers with triazole linkers). It looks like Hawker was able to do it, to a point anyway. But I guess for our stuff, it was a little too amphiphilic to want to dissolve completely in anything. They do say that those Frechet-type dendrons with triazole lnikers aren’t soluble in very much, and their frechet-type G4 dendrimer has diethylene glycol groups on it, probably to fix the solubility issue.
Pfft. Flat and soluble are not necessarily mutually exclusive!
To me this brings up the image of our sugary HR boss doing pfffft under steamroller. (But I don’t wish misfortune to anyone; we are all Christians here).
flat with solubilizing groups is not flat anymore
still flat enough for significant pi-overlap! bite me.
I’m with excimer. After anthracene, flat becomes
A guy who wants to kill himself with cancer.
I would just like to point out that I voted for reviews, since I have three of them and no book chapter – which seems a perfectly fine reason to me.
Funny. I voted for book chapter since that’s what I’m writing.
It’s nicer to have a book on your shelf with a hard cover and it costs $200 and you can tell people you’re published in a book and be all arrogant and shit about the whole thing.
I’ve also been under the impression that writing a chapter is a skosh more 31337 because book chapter invites are harder to get than review article invites.
if we’re going to brag, i’ve been cited by Hawker before.
and Fréchet
I prefer review articles because they are easier to access online. A review may not morph into a trophy on your bookshelf, but at least a larger audience will be able to see your work.
Some publishers pay for book chapters though. @Kyle: ask for some of the proceeds!
i’d be curious to hear opinions on the relative merits/helpfulness of reviews published in different journals (ACIE, Chem Rev, Chem Comm, etc). or do you not see patterns in quality emerge within individual journals?
Individuals, definitely individuals. I’ve seen some great reviews even appear in Talanta!
Btw…my earlier post was meant to be tongue in cheek.
I especially like the “reviews” that people give at Gordon conferences.
I’m with Excimer – the Frechet dendrimers are evil to make, ones based on 2,2-bishydroxymethylpropionic acid are much nicer and quicker. The problem with Hawker’s and a few others (some can be made on a kilogram scale) is the application. It isn’t just about the structure but things like biocompatibility and excretion for bio apps, stability for catalysis, good solubility…etc.
PAMAMs are most widely researched because you can buy them from Aldrich and then do stuff with them and call yourself a dendrimer chemist. A lit search for PAMAMS pretty much shows that anyone with an instrument or analytical technique or application goes off, buys some and writes it up.
Now, hyperbranched polymers on the other hand – one pot and you’re done!
I can understand why somebody likes dendrimers, buys them and even uses them in dendrimer-themed orgies and so on. But why on Earth would anybody admit doing that? A combichem chemist is bad enough to be used as a racist slurr but a “dendrimer chemist”? I would rather be caught in a sheep than doing dendrimers.
True, I’d rather figure out how to make a highly functionilized star polymer in some sort of homogeneous catalytic fashion.
In other news, I think we just started a flame war.
As long as you don’t care about pi-delocalization, I suppose the above systems will get the job done. Now a click approach to fully conjugated systems I would like to see, bonus points for metal attachment sites.
In my opinion I do not think there is a significant difference beetween a review article and a book chapter, the two are basically fluxional. I have complained to at least one journal about “paper recylcing” of this sort.
I agree. pi-delocalization is sexxxy.
Rhenium, Excimer – I dont know if you would be still interested in making conjugated metal-chelating dendrimers but there is one enormously sexy click chemistry that is very easy to do (RT or 40C, no catalyst): nitrile oxide with acetylene produces 3,5-disubstituted isoxazole. Nitrile oxides are unstable bitches typically prepared from aldoximes in situ because they like to dimerise – but it turns out that when you have aryl-CN=O with two ortho methyls the nitriloxide is a stable cryst solid!
Rubber industry loves to use the 1,3,5-trimethyl-2,4-bis(nitriloxide)-benzene as a delicate cros-linker for natural rubber when making medical latex gloves etc – because unlike other vulcanising agents this one works at low temperature, does not produce stinky rubbery odors and latex discoloration.
Do you have a particular reference handy?
no I don’t but drop me an e-mail, tomasv AT scripps DOT edu: the way I heard about it was that a small medical supply company was looking into making that stuff inhouse rather then buing it (because it was rather expensive) and I was trying to help them
hawker is funny as hell. he is also cheap as hell (no vacuum controllers on the rotovaps), despite being paid like a motherfucker.
Have you ever been to a bar (or related establishment) with the man? I’ve been trying unsuccessfully to buy my own drink for years now.
There is available residue to study outside the box. _While reiterating and trafficking certain points in this warrants their differentiation in contrasting ways_. _Constants in chemical shifts of the two inner-sphere water molecules by means of the Lipari-Szabo approach _Anisotropic (ADPs) Regularization of Posterior Probability to solve
ill-proposed problemszero-sum approximations_ and G4- PAMAM dendrimers_(unmodified G2), _the relaxivity is not controlled by water exchange but by rotational dynamics_ _effect reversibly binding of a ligand to a metal ion, forming a metal complex_ _and informal substitutions_ _ overlapped PAIRS micro-dissected_ _the clips and tweezers only depended on the skeletal structure_ Langmuir-Blodgett [1] monolayers _in thinly bedded, low-resistivity pay zones_ _and dissociation had to be taken into account in terms of_ _the Lipari-Szabo “model-free” approach_ without any significant guest chloroform motion of a van der Waals inclusion observed for the host-guest complex_ _observed in chloroform solution._[1] _in terms of the dendrimer_s _informal substitution of a directionally dependent anisotrophs_ {{{trails of into polynominal time and dark matter} is usually isotrophy but all this only creates one chromosome_ _complementary to 12 nt_ _by 1 nt_, _and informal substitutions_ _which is more rapid than the irreversible loss of order of varied chemical environments_. _Which has adjusted the length of its reaction cycle to the slower growth rates of Archaea_.I voted review article because a) you get your picture included, and b) more people read them. The textbooks are only read by a few people in your specality and they’re so expensive.
review article. How many book chapters do you read on-line every week? It is suuuuuuch a Royal Pain doing a lit search and finding the utterly perfect title and realizing it’s in a “book” – like I really want to go to the library in person at 2 a.m.? And, yes, I do see varying degrees of quality in a single journal. They’re probably up at 2 a.m. trying to edit something they forgot they were supposed to review.
you can synthesis what you want with some basic methodes and give to them interesting properties